Tamsin Greenway ponders the merit in implementing any of the Fast5 rules into netball

In the next portion of the weeks column, Tamsin Greenway ponders on the virtues (or not) of executing some of those Fast5 rules into the complete format of netball…
Lately , there was a questionnaire in Australia on what rules people would like to see changed in the match that is seven-a-side.
As the sport continues to drive forward, rule changes to make itTV or bring into a wider audience will be considered
With this in mind, and after the epic British Fast5 All-Stars Championships in the Box past weekend, I wanted to have a take a look at some of the rules which were thrown around which could be thought about or implemented in the game.
I think the shooting one is quite intriguing… and probably has the most amount of uproar when suggesting a shift.
I certainly wouldnt want to observe long-bombs in terms of shooting outside the circle in a 60-minute game. However, I am intrigued about how the circle could divide into places.
Weve produced a game where weve got big, tall shooters and it is becoming harder to play at the circle unless youre close to becoming 6ft tall or over, although I am not stating that it needs to alter in the league right now.
There are still a few [shorter] GAs exactly that which selectors are considering, and what children know although floating around, is that you will want to have shooters with near pole percentages that are shooting to create it. We went through years of altering every short GA into a WA!
I think because of this we have also created a panic of shooting at long distance and that I believe were making a issue with youngsters than embracing the simple fact that if you can shoot longyou need to.
When I set it out on Twitter a few of those Australian fans were saying that theyd trialled it that people simply passed it in and out and making a mockery of the game.
However, I believe that just backs up my point. Most players dont shoot from space and Australia, alongside others, have been a leader in this change from the game. New Zealand just won a World Cup on shooting from 17, whereas we can not overlook that.
So, this question is can it assist be able to perform with 60 minutes and to acquire more time on court? Can it change tactics and team selection?
Splitting the ring to two and one things will certainly alter the dynamic of this defence because if shooters are going out of distance, the way you win ball suddenly becomes very different. It would change the functions of the circle.
Especially with a number of the blowout games in Superleague, with one and two point shots, could it also help? Look at a team such as Storm who finished – could Sophie Hankin shooting Karyn Bailey and distance being in a position to rebound have shifted results and matches if those points were made to two?
This is why I do not think that we ought to completely take it off the desk. I understand there are a great deal of traditionalists out there and that I get since its too, I love our sport, but I think that the game has changed in the last few decades. I really dont see that theres any reason why it couldnt be viewed at or explored some more to see whether it has a place to help improve and not hinder.
Im not a fan of subs. A whole lot of people may say impact is brought by it and that it is the one to change and they dont mind it.
Firstly I am not entirely against it, since I do think that we do need to eliminate the dodgy timeouts – since honestly the imitation injuries are very simple to see, but I cant get my mind around unlimited rolling subs. If there was a limit to these or there has been a move towards the strategic timeout which Suncorp has introduced afterward Id be more keen.
My issues stem from participants point of view and both a trainers. As a participant, in certain places its not always so easy to go make an effect in five or six minutes in a quarter. So, unless youre having a complete shocker, as a player you need to have the ability to work things out and be given moment to do so.
I believe it could turn into a justification for a lack of coaching. Its a very easy cop-out if a participant isnt really doing what you want to just roll on a different sub par, try something new. Therell be occasions this must occur but this would not be a constant if youve completed your homework.
I liked to trust that participant and to give my players the opportunity in quarter-time to attempt to change things. I believe we have to appear at this filters down from elite degree and if the sole answer ever would be to simply keep trying new players out we might eliminate the very essence of what playing and coaching is all about.
I like the Power Play it is brilliant, but I do not think that it has a place at the regular game. It is that easy in my novel.
With Centre Passes I really dont think that you need to be given an additional lifeline. Shooting from distance requires execution and skill, being awarded the ball or things back to help get nearer excitement or games takes it too far.
Your Centre Pass ought to be as strong as your attacking Centre Pass. You ought to have tactical elements that imply you could win off ball teams no matter and arrangements, so I really dont feel that you ought to be given a lifeline because youre losing. Thats part of sport – you lose or you win.
A key part of all netball is it is what you choose to do with it and that you receive the ball 50 per cent of this time. I think that there are ways to secure games and I certainly do not feel this is one of these.

Read more: nba games